That attitude struck me as uninclusive, mostly because I was on the losing end of the policy. While separating ages works well for the program presenters, how well does it serve the audience? There are two arguments:
- The Library says: "Our performers and presenters prepare programs for specific age groups so that kids don't get bored or confused by material that is too young or old for them. Some programs are "kids only" because if adults attended, fewer children could come (all people in the room count toward room capacity)."
- The Parent says: "Family learning is important and occurs only when the entire family can participate equally. Schools provide age-separated learning. Informal learning environments should engage the entire family to meet needs not met in other venues. Intergenerational learning is a unique experience and should be encouraged."
I wondered how museums handle the same situation and asked a group of educators for their opinions. I also posed the same question to a group of parents. I am compiling their responses. Check back soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome and read! Posts that adhere to proper web etiquette by being relevant to the topic, using professional language, and avoiding insulting other posters will be approved. Disagreeing with a post or comment is OK, but anything demeaning or hurtful will be deleted.